Enjoyable concert: string rehearsal

Last night I went to the first rehearsal for a concert I’m playing in on Saturday. This is another nice event: it’s a mainly-choral concert which happens once a year. There is a small orchestra consisting of invited players, and a very good choir which I think consists of invited singers. (Well I’m assuming they’ll be good; last night was a strings-only rehearsal, but this will be the third year I’ve played and they were excellent the first two times.)

The music (for us) is

  • Vaughan Williams, Fantasia on a Theme of Thomas Tallis
  • Fauré, Requiem
  • Vaughan Williams, Towards the Unknown Region

though probably not in that order.

I’m not sure how well-known Vaughan Williams is outside the UK, so perhaps I should say a little about the Fantasia (and then give you a Wikipedia link or similar when I’ve looked it up). In this country it’s regarded as the string piece of all time, really (unless that place belongs to Elgar’s Introduction and Allegro). It was originally written to be performed in, I think, Gloucester Cathedral and it is written for string orchestra, a second, smaller string orchestra of about 8 players (seated well away from the main one), and string quartet. Just strings. In the original performance the string quartet was again seated separately, but we’re playing it the usual way: the leaders of the string sections stay in their normal seats and play solo for the quartet bits. We’re not playing it in a cathedral but we are playing it in a large parish church which isn’t much different from a cathedral and has just the right acoustics.

It’s a lyrical and very English piece, which uses everything from the sound of a quartet on its own to the lushly orchestrated sound of the whole string orchestra playing as loud as they can… Actually, around 18 months ago I had the opportunity to play it at an orchestral study day (just for strings) where we had an orchestra of about 60 string players; now that was quite something.) The second orchestra typically feature as an ethereal sound in the far distance, which continues after a climax from the full orchestra or which precedes a dramatic entry by everyone. The piece is based on a hymn setting by the Renaissance composer Thomas Tallis, and a small choir will sing the original from the back of the church before we then play the Fantasia.

For this concert I’m sitting at the front of the first violins, next to the leader. I hadn’t known this or maybe I’d have looked at the music a bit more, because it means that I have to lead the orchestra in the sections where she’s playing solo as part of the string quartet. But I’ve played the piece before, so that’s OK. Anyway I digress. Her comment about playing the Fantasia after a summer of non-playing was “It’s like a nice hot bath”–which it is, really.

Towards the Unknown Region was a new piece to me. As I feared from the title, it did, towards the end, ascend speedily to heights on the violin which are unknown to many players… I ought to have a look a that section before Saturday. There’s about half a page of it.

And yes, the Fauré is the same piece as in the conducting course (see Opening the Envelope and How the conducting course went), but in a different version: this one has a full violin section. But it’s still a viola extravaganza really; we only play for a few of the movements, and then when we do play we often feel as though we should try to sound like violas. 😉

There’s another rehearsal tomorrow, then the concert is on Saturday. I wasn’t really in the mood for rehearsals and concerts yet, but this should be good. 🙂

Two-handed computing

A question that probably doesn’t get asked very often:

Why do right-handed people use a mouse with their right hand?

I am but I don’t, you see…

When I first used a computer with a mouse, I was working for someone who was interested in psychology. He had a theory that it was best to use the mouse with his non-dominant hand. As a violinist, having to do all my fingering with my left hand, and as someone who is also interested in psychology, I decided he might have a point. So, rather than use the mouse with my right hand–which is also my writing hand–I learnt to use it with my left hand.

I think he was right–the left hand tends to be used for more instinctive actions such as holding an awkwardly-shaped object in place, and the right hand for more conscious ones such as working on the awkwardly-shaped object with tools. Using the mouse is an instinctive action so the left hand is the ideal candidate.

If I use someone else’s computer, invariably the first thing I do is move the mouse over from where they’ve put it to the left-hand side. Then then normally ask whether I’m left-handed. In fact, the reason I use my left hand for it is that I’m right-handed. Basically

  • the left hand moves the mouse

while the right hand is free to

  • use the keyboard, especially the Return key
  • hold a pen to write notes with
  • hold the coffee mug!

Why doesn’t everyone do it?

When you’re used to this way of working, using the same hand for the mouse as for everything else seems quite labourious and clumsy. For example, as I typed the full stop at the end of that sentence with my right hand, my left hand moved to the mouse in anticipation of saving the post… then back to type another sentence… and in a moment, to the mouse again to click the Save button.

Shhhhhh…

First of all: apologies to any library staff who are looking over my shoulder as I paste the text into this post; today it’s nice and quiet, and I’m enjoying myself. Well it’s just got a bit noisier but I’m sure it will pass.

Working in a library

Well, working in it as a library user, trying to update my blog yesterday. With a very tired brain, and eyes that didn’t want to stay open and a mild headache, but able to concentrate given the right conditions.

Needing quiet, I went to the Heritage Library (a section of our town library), which is normally full of people quietly sitting at microfiche readers and ploughing through parish records, 100-year-old newspapers and the like in search of their family history and what have you. Looking forward to a nice quiet time online in congenial surroundings.

Only four or five other users in–that’s a good start 🙂 And they’re all quietly engrossed in what they’re doing…

Only one problem: the library staff. Now, you expect that librarians and library assistants will be quite sensitive to noise, don’t you? And that they’ll periodically ask people to be a little bit quieter, if they start talking too loudly and making it difficult for people to work?

In fact, the library staff were making far more noise than most of the users–so much so that it was next to impossible to concentrate on what I was doing. The main problem was one particular staff member who had the sort of voice which is naturally loud, but who seemed quite unaware of its loudness or of any need to restrain it. He was talking at a volume suitable for giving a lecture to us all, really. And the telephone at the desk kept ringing–why as it there, rather than in the office about ten feet away–causing him to have long VERY LOUD conversations.

Next to each of the PCs, including the one I was using, is a little sign saying something like “In consideration of other library users, please keep conversation to a minimum and ensure that your phone is turned off or on silent ring”. I happened to be looking at that when their phone went off yet again, apparently on the loudest possible ring, and was cheerfully and loudly answered by Mr Noisy.

So, with some embarrassment, I went and found the staff member who looked the most senior and was working the most quietly, and said the noise was making it difficult to work–was there any way to keep the noise down? A few minutes later, Mr Noisy was talking somewhat more quietly. For a short while, anyway. Although still very audible it did give the impression of someone trying to talk quietly, and that’s quite helpful.

A bit ironic though when the library users have to ask the library staff to be quiet and not the other way round! So it was amusing too, not only annoying. A friend suggested to me that maybe loud talking is how librarians get their job satisfaction. 😉

Why “library staff”?

Why have I kept talking about “library assistants” and “library staff” in all that, when “librarians” is shorter and easier to type?

What you need to know is that librarians and library assistants are not the same thing. In fact they’re very much not the same thing. A librarian is someone who has done a degree-level qualification on how to run a library, how to accurately and consistently catalogue books, etc. A library assistant is simply someone who works in a library, carrying out whatever practical tasks they are assigned.

Your typical librarian, however, deals all the time with people who don’t realise that their job entails any skill at all. If you want to upset a librarian, go round calling library assistants librarians. I have several friends who are librarians, so I prefer not to upset them… and since I don’t know who was a librarian or library assistant in that library, it seems best to call them all “library staff”.

Note to library staff: See, I’m on your side really! 😉

Ella Minnow Pea

Mark Dunn, Ella Minnow Pea: A novel without letters, Methuen, 2003

This is quite an unusual novel, and one which must have been quite a challenge to write.

It is set in an independent island state called Nollop–named after Nevin Nollop, who according to the island’s religion was the originator of the sentence The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. In the island’s culture, words and writing are very important. They believe (wrongly) that Nollop’s is the shortest possible English sentence containing all letters of the alphabet; Nevin Nollop is revered (or maybe worshipped) as its originator. There is a statue of him on the island, complete with lettered tiles bearing his famous sentence.

All is well until one day the letter Z falls from the statue. The island’s council, who turn out to have fundamentalist beliefs and totalitarian tendencies, decide that

  • the falling of the tile is a message from beyond the grave from Nollop
  • the message is that the letter Z should no longer be used
  • they should introduce harsh penalties for its use–in speech as well as in writing.

This of course has rather drastic consequences, such as the destruction of all books containing the letter Z, which is all of them. And as the novel is written entirely in the form of correspondence, the author too has to stop using the letter.

A short while later, the letter Q falls from the statue. A new decree is issued. As time goes on, more and more letters fall, and each in turn is banned. The situation on the island becomes more and more dire, the rules ever stricter, language ever more unusual and ingenious, and the story ever more engrossing.

Ella is the main character. If you read her name aloud, you will see why she’s called that: LMNOP. And the crisis does indeed reach the point where these are the only letters available for use. At which point… But if I told you that, you’d know the climax of the story. Suffice to say that sanity eventually prevails.

It might sound as though this book is nothing more than a literary trick–to write with most of the alphabet missing–but actually it’s much more than that. It’s an allegory about why irrationality, fundamentalism and totalitarianism are wrong. And I say that as someone who does have a religious faith; just not a fundamentalist one (in fact I think fundamentalism is incompatible with real religion, which should be liberating, not enslaving). Maybe it’s also about the human urge for communication: even with most of the alphabet missing, people still find ways to express themselves. And it is also very entertaining: satire at its best.

Here is the Council’s explanation of why extreme punishments are acceptable (at this point, only the letters Z and Q are forbidden):

Those of you who see undue cruelty in the punishments meted our for speaking or writing the forbidden letters should make note of the following three points:

  1. Adhering to the commandments of Nollop leaves no room for fear of punishment or forfeiture. (He who walks in the light has no reason to fear the darkness.)
  2. There is no such thing as accident or misspeak, only grossly under-applied discoursal perspicacity, with unguarded exposure to distractional digression. (A lighted path is clear. There is no reason, save mischief, to stray into the darkness.)
  3. The severity of the punishment is an irrelevant issue, given the opportunity to avoid punishment altogether. (Keep to the path to avoid what is promised to be a broken and jagged shoulder.)

A clear, but totally wrong, argument…

And here’s an example of the language later into the book, when B, C, D, F, J, K, Q, V and Z are all illegal and Ella leaves a note for one of her neighbours, who has been looking for food:

Woman in pretty orange hat:
My name is Ella. I saw you yesters, rummaging in the rear — that shut Itlian restaurant on Main. No got to rummage. There are plenty eats in Wally’s store at Eighth meets Elm. (Are you a shrimp eater?) Wally, I hear, is a humane man. He is rationing eats — they will last longer this way. No money? No got to worry. We who are still here will help one another. I want to meet you. See me tonight?
I use to possess relations — my mother, my papa, my Aunt Mittie, her she-heir Tassie. Gone now. All those near to me, gone.
I am alone. Perhaps you are alone too?
See me tonight? My home: 4 houses east. I got stew tomatoes!

As you’ll have gathered, I love language and I found this an engrossing read. I strongly recommend it to someone who wants to read something a bit different (and satirical, but also deadly serious).

Why did I choose today to write about this book? One of the keys of my phone dropped off, leaving me unable to use the letters W, X, Y and Z until I’d glued it back on…!

Update: another review

Viewing Google searches that brought people here is a very useful thing. On this occasion (Sept. 2nd) I had a look to see the other search results and I discovered another review of the book, by an equally enthusiastic reader whose blog can be found at http://kimiswellread.blogspot.com/ and is well worth a look if you would like to browse lots of book reviews (mainly of fiction).

An art and photography blog

OK, well I want to try out the ‘trackback’ feature and I also want to people to look at RachelCreative‘s blog, so here are links to several of my favourite posts on the parts of her site I’ve explored so far–let’s see whether the trackback thing does indeed do its job.

  • Marshmallow on skewer: simple but very appetizing. How on earth does someone capture the essence of a toasted marshmallow in a few lines? Like this, evidently.
  • Dog Bignose and Ghostly: interesting glimpse of the drawing process. A curve and two dots, already with their own character, becoming a dog.
  • Chairs: My kind of photograph: making the everyday look beautiful.

When I took “A” level General Studies too many years ago to admit (which I therefore won’t), one of the questions in the exam was “How would you define art? Discuss the claims of one of the following to be an art form”, and the one I chose to write about was photography. I notice, somewhat to my shame, that I’ve mentioned “art and photography” in this post’s title. That’s not really right, since good photography is art, and I think this applies particularly to good black-and-white photography. It’s not just taking a picture of something ready-made; I think it’s showing the viewer how you see something. Or sometimes it’s taking what you’d think of as Nothing–two chairs and a table, for example–and arranging it in such a way that it becomes Something. And making Something out of Nothing is definitely creative.

What I like about Rachel’s blog is the way she lets us see the process at work; it makes me want to get my SLR out and start taking photographs with it again 🙂

And Rachel, don’t let the review go to your head 😉